Wednesday, May 13, 2026
  1. HB 82: Report Card Changes for the 2021–22 School Year
  2. Analysis of November 2025 School Levy Results
  3. Analysis of Ohio Residential Property Taxes: A Balanced Approach to Reform
  4. Ohio Economically Disadvantaged Cost Study
  5. OEPI Analysis of Property Tax Provisions in the FY26–27 State Budget
  6. Revenue Generated by Emergency & Substitute Levies
  7. Impact of the Proposed Elimination of Inside Millage
  8. OEPI Analysis of the Impact of Eliminating Inside Millage
  9. Dr. Fleeter’s Testimony on HB 96 (Senate Education Committee)
  10. Ohio Property Tax Trends (1975-2023)
  11. State Share of Base Cost Funding FY99-FY19
  12. Dr. Fleeter’s Testimony on HB 96 (House Education Committee)
  13. Factors Behind the Transitional Aid Guarantee
  14. OEPI Analysis of Administrator Data
  15. OEPI Initial Analysis of Executive Budget K-12 Funding Proposal
  16. OEPI Analysis of Cupp Report Administrator Data
  17. OEPI Analysis of K-12 Budget Proposal
  18. OEPI Review of Ohio School Finance Study
  19. November 2024 School Levies Overview
  20. OEPI’s Ohio Special Ed Cost Analysis
  21. Ohio Property Tax Reappraisal Trends
  22. FY24 vs FY25 State Foundation Funding Comparison
  23. 2003-2023 Ohio Property Tax Reappraisal Analysis
  24. FY24 vs. FY25 School Funding Comparison
  25. Testimony on Property Tax Review and Reform
  26. Ohio School Funding Summary from FY11-FY24
  27. Dr. Fleeter on 10WBSN’s Report on Ohio Sports Gaming Revenue
  28. Dr. Fleeter’s Summary of Replacement Levy Utilization by Ohio School Districts (2014–2023)
  29. Ohio Property Tax Trends (1975–2022)
  30. OEPI HB 920: Updated Explanation
  31. Ohio School Voucher Overview
  32. Overview of Senate FY24–25 State Budget
  33. Constructing an Adequate School Funding Formula
  34. Summary of LSC HB 1 Fiscal Note
  35. House Bill 1 Summary & Analysis
  36. OEPI Economically Disadvantaged Student Cost Study
  37. Ohio Gifted Education Incentives Study
  38. Ohio Educational Service Center Cost Study
  39. Ohio English Learner Cost Study
  40. Ohio Gifted Funding Accountability Study
  41. Ohio Special Ed Cost Study
  42. New vs. Renewal Operating Levies (1994-2022)
  43. FY22 Report Card Analysis
  44. Overview of November 2022 Ohio School Levies
  45. Solar Energy Property Taxes vs. PILOT for Energy Projects (PPT)
  46. Solar Power Installation Property Taxes vs. PILOT Comparison
  47. CAUV Formula Change Analysis
  48. 2003-2022 Levies by Election
  49. New vs. Renewal and Replacement Operating Levies (1984-2022)
  50. School Operating Levies (1976-2022)
  51. School Operating & Capital Levy Totals, By Year (1984-2022)
  52. Changes in Ohio School Funding & TPP Replacement (FY11–FY22)
  53. Overview of May 2022 Ohio School Levies on the Ballot
  54. Overview of the Ohio Senate’s FY22-23 School Funding Formula
  55. The Central Importance of the DeRolph Rulings to School Funding in Ohio
  56. HB 82 Report Card System Changes
  57. Ohio Income Tax Changes and Equity (1972–2021)
  58. HB 110 EdChoice Voucher Program Changes
  59. HB 110 School Funding Formula Changes
  60. Ohio School Funding Trends (FY11–FY21)
  61. Ohio FY20 GRF Tax Revenue: COVID Impact & Recovery
  62. Ohio Solar Energy & Impact on School District Revenues
  63. House & Senate Bills Seek to Revise Ohio’s School Report Card
  64. OEPI Testimony on HB 110 School Funding
  65. Dr. Fleeter’s Testimony to the Senate Primary and Secondary Education Committee on HB 110.
  66. Updated: COVID-19 Impact on Ohio GRF Revenues (FY20 & FY21)
  67. 2020 Ohio School Levy Summary & Analysis
  68. HB 305 School Funding Plan Overview
  69. EdChoice Voucher Program Update
  70. OEPI President Message on OEPI’s Value
  71. OEPI Property Trends Report (1975-2015)
  72. Update: Appeal of Natural Gas Pipeline Values
  73. Update on Ohio’s Controversial Territory Transfer Law
  74. COVID-19 Impact on Ohio GRF Revenues (FY20 & FY21)
  75. Supplemental Funding for Power Plant Districts
  76. OEPI Officers Update
  77. Appeal of Natural Gas Pipeline Values
  78. Ohio’s Controversial Territory Transfer Law
  79. 2019 Ohio School Levy Summary & Analysis
  80. Analysis of the Cupp-Patterson School Funding Proposal (HB 305)
  81. OEPI Press Release on 20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph
  82. 20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph
  83. OEPI Analysis of Ed Trust “2018 Funding Gaps” Report
  84. OEPI Research Update: GRF Revenues, School Funding, and District Trends (2017)
  85. House Finance Primary and Secondary Ed Subcommittee House Bill 49 Testimony
  86. Analysis of HB 398 & SB 246 Changes to Ohio’s CAUV Formula
  87. OEPI Research Update: GRF Revenues, Funding Formula Issues & School Levies (2016)
  88. Community School Funding & Ohio Education Finance Trends
  89. CS Deduction and the Gain Cap
  90. Open Enrollment
  91. FY16-17 GRF Tax Revenues
  92. Casino & VLT Revenues
  93. OEPI Value Added Newsletter Article
  94. Senate Bill 208 Modifications to TPP Replacement Payments
  95. 2015 School Levy Update
  96. FY 16-17 Guarantee & Gain Cap
  97. Preliminary FY 15 Ohio Test Score Analysis
  98. Video Lottery Terminal (VLT) Revenue Update
  99. FY16-17 Phase-Out of TPP Replacement Payments
  100. FY16-17 School Funding Components
  101. Casino Tax Revenue Update
  102. Budget Bill Changes Election Law
  103. Transitional Aid Guarantee Analysis
  104. School Funding Comparison & Analysis: FY15 vs. FY17 Plans
  105. Recent Changes in Ohio Property Valuations
  106. State/Local Share of Funding in FY14-15 as Proposed by the Governor and House for FY16-17

Overview: Recent reappraisal increases are far outside historical norms. The 2023 reappraisal and update increase was 7.3 times as large as the prior reappraisal and update increase for the same counties in 2017, while the 2022 reappraisal increase was 4.0 times as large as the increase in 2016 and the 2021 increase was 3.8 times as large as the increase in 2015. Also, indications from county auditors are that the reappraisal increases in 2024 will be comparable to (and possibly larger than) those in 2023. However, the data shown here clearly indicates that these recent large increases in housing values are best viewed as a historically anomalous short-term issue.

 

Part I: 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020 & 2023 Reappraisal and Update Analysis

Tables 1 and 2 below provide some insight on patterns of reappraisal increases from 2005 through 2023. The seven years shown in the table are all property reappraisal or statistical update years for the same group of 41 counties. These 41 counties are listed below.

 

2023 Reappraisal Counties (N=28)

Auglaize, Clinton, Darke, Defiance, Delaware, Franklin, Gallia, Geauga, Hamilton, Hardin, Harrison, Henry, Jackson, Licking, Mahoning, Mercer, Morrow, Perry, Pickaway, Pike, Preble, Putnam, Richland, Seneca, Shelby, Trumbull, Van Wert, Wood

 

2023 Update Counties (N=13)

Ashland, Ashtabula, Athens, Butler, Clermont, Fulton, Greene, Knox, Madison, Montgomery, Noble, Summit, Wayne

Note that the list above is exactly the same for the years 2005, 2011 and 2017. And in 2008, 2014 and 2020 the counites undergoing reappraisal in 2023 experienced the statistical update while the counties undergoing the update went through full reappraisal.

 

Table 1 compares the total reappraisal and update increases in Class I residential and agricultural real property value with the total increase in Class I property value from the preceding year (the other primary factor in valuation increases from one year to the next is new construction).

The data in Table 1 clearly shows how unusual a year 2023 was in terms of reappraisal increases. Class I reappraisal and update increases totaled $44.769 billion in 2023. This is 93.6% of the total increase in Class I value from FY22. Three years earlier in 2020, reappraisal increases were only $13.706 billion and were 88% of the total Class I valuation increase. In 2008 reappraisal increases were $2.099 billion and were responsible for only 57% of the total $3.680 increase in Class I value. Note that the negative change in valuation in 2011 reflects the impact of the housing market decline brought on by the 2008-09 recession.

 

Table 2 provides a second perspective on reappraisal increases. Table 2 shows Class I reappraisal increases and compares to the prior year Class I valuation figure to compute a percentage increase in valuation due to reappraisal. Note that the data in Table 2 is only for counties undergoing reappraisal and update in each of the seven years included in the table.

Table 2 clearly shows that the 34.7% average increase in reappraisal value in 2023 is far higher than that in any of the other years in which these counties underwent reappraisal or statistical update. This again reinforces the extent to which 2023 was an outlier in terms of Class I property reappraisal increases.

 

Part II: 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019 & 2022 Reappraisal and Update Analysis

Tables 3 and 4 below provide some insight on patterns of reappraisal increases from 2004 through 2022. The seven years shown in the table are all property reappraisal or statistical update years for the same group of 23 counties. These 23 counties are listed below.

 

2022 Reappraisal Counties (N=12)

Adams, Columbiana, Hancock, Hocking, Holmes, Lawrence, Meigs, Monroe, Paulding, Scioto, Tuscarawas, Washington

 

2022 Update Counties (N=11)

Carroll, Champaign, Clark, Fairfield, Logan, Marion, Medina, Miami, Ross, Union, Wyandot

 

Table 3 compares the total reappraisal and update increases in Class I residential and agricultural real property value with the total increase in Class I property value from the preceding year (the other primary factor in valuation increases from one year to the next is new construction).

As was the case in Table 1, the data in Table 3 clearly show that 2022 was also an unusual year in terms of reappraisal increases. Class I reappraisal and update increases totaled $7.193 billion in 2022. This is 76.4% of the total increase in Class I value from 2021. Three years earlier in 2019, reappraisal increases were only $2.756 billion and were 61.6% of the total Class I valuation increase. The reappraisal and update increases in the other five years shown in Table 3 were all less than the 2019 figure. Note that the negative change in valuation in 2010 reflects the impact of the housing market decline brought on by the 2008-09 recession.

 

Table 4 provides a second perspective on reappraisal increases just as Table 2 above did. Table 4 shows Class I reappraisal increases and compares to the prior year Class I valuation figure to compute a percentage increase in valuation due to reappraisal. Note that the data in Table 4 is only for counties undergoing reappraisal and update in each of the seven years included in the table.

* Again, this data only includes reappraisal increases in school districts whose home counties underwent reappraisal or update. Figures vary slightly from those in Table 3 because of school districts with territory in more than 1 county.

 

As was the case in Table 2, Table 4 clearly shows that the 22.1% average increase in reappraisal value in 2022 is far higher than that in any of the other years in which these counties underwent reappraisal or statistical update. This again reinforces the extent to which 2022 was an outlier in terms of Class I property reappraisal increases.

 

Part III: 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018 & 2021 Reappraisal and Update Analysis

Tables 5 and 6 below provide some insight on patterns of reappraisal increases from 2003 through 2021. The seven years shown in the table are all property reappraisal or statistical update years for the same group of 24 counties. These 24 counties are listed below.

 

2021 Reappraisal Counties (N=5)

Allen, Coshocton, Guernsey, Sandusky, Vinton

 

2021 Update Counties (N=19)

Belmont, Brown, Crawford, Cuyahoga, Erie, Fayette, Highland, Huron, Jefferson, Lake, Lorain, Lucas, Morgan, Muskingum, Ottawa, Portage, Stark, Warren, Williams

 

Table 5 compares the total reappraisal and update increases in Class I residential and agricultural real property value with the total increase in Class I property value from the preceding year (the other primary factor in valuation increases from one year to the next is new construction).

As was the case in Tables 1 and 3, the data in Table 5 clearly show that 2021 was also an unusual year in terms of reappraisal increases. Class I reappraisal and update increases totaled $10.596 billion in 2021. This is amount is 61% larger than the next highest reappraisal increase (2006) and 85.3% of the total increase in Class I value from 2020. Three years earlier in 2018, reappraisal increases were only $5.345 billion and were 80.0% of the total Class I valuation increase. Furthermore, information released this summer by county auditors in counties undergoing reappraisal and update in 2024 indicates that the reappraisal increases this year will be even larger than those in 2021. Finally, the negative changes in valuation in both 2009 and 2012 reflect the impact of the housing market decline brought on by the 2008-09 recession.

 

Table 6 provides a second perspective on reappraisal increases just as Tables 2 and 4 above did. Table 6 shows Class I reappraisal increases and compares to the prior year Class I valuation figure to compute a percentage increase in valuation due to reappraisal. Note that the data in Table 6 is only for counties undergoing reappraisal and update in each of the seven years included in the table.

As was the case in Tables 2 and 4, Table 6 shows that the 15.1% average increase in reappraisal value in 2021 is higher than that in any of the other years in which these counties underwent reappraisal or statistical update. This again reinforces the extent to which 2021 marks the beginning of the recent period characterized by historically large Class I property reappraisal increases. And again, data released recently by county auditors in counties undergoing reappraisal and update indicates that the 2024 reappraisal increase will be even larger than those in 2024.

 

Table 7 combines the data shown in Tables 2, 4 and 6 and provides a summary of reappraisal increases over the 21-year period from 2003 through 2023. Table 7 shows that while the average percentage of reappraisal increase has been increasing since 2017, it is only since 2022 that the average percentage increase has been far outside historical norms over the past 21 years.