Wednesday, May 13, 2026
  1. HB 82: Report Card Changes for the 2021–22 School Year
  2. Analysis of November 2025 School Levy Results
  3. Analysis of Ohio Residential Property Taxes: A Balanced Approach to Reform
  4. Ohio Economically Disadvantaged Cost Study
  5. OEPI Analysis of Property Tax Provisions in the FY26–27 State Budget
  6. Revenue Generated by Emergency & Substitute Levies
  7. Impact of the Proposed Elimination of Inside Millage
  8. OEPI Analysis of the Impact of Eliminating Inside Millage
  9. Dr. Fleeter’s Testimony on HB 96 (Senate Education Committee)
  10. Ohio Property Tax Trends (1975-2023)
  11. State Share of Base Cost Funding FY99-FY19
  12. Dr. Fleeter’s Testimony on HB 96 (House Education Committee)
  13. Factors Behind the Transitional Aid Guarantee
  14. OEPI Analysis of Administrator Data
  15. OEPI Initial Analysis of Executive Budget K-12 Funding Proposal
  16. OEPI Analysis of Cupp Report Administrator Data
  17. OEPI Analysis of K-12 Budget Proposal
  18. OEPI Review of Ohio School Finance Study
  19. November 2024 School Levies Overview
  20. OEPI’s Ohio Special Ed Cost Analysis
  21. Ohio Property Tax Reappraisal Trends
  22. FY24 vs FY25 State Foundation Funding Comparison
  23. 2003-2023 Ohio Property Tax Reappraisal Analysis
  24. FY24 vs. FY25 School Funding Comparison
  25. Testimony on Property Tax Review and Reform
  26. Ohio School Funding Summary from FY11-FY24
  27. Dr. Fleeter on 10WBSN’s Report on Ohio Sports Gaming Revenue
  28. Dr. Fleeter’s Summary of Replacement Levy Utilization by Ohio School Districts (2014–2023)
  29. Ohio Property Tax Trends (1975–2022)
  30. OEPI HB 920: Updated Explanation
  31. Ohio School Voucher Overview
  32. Overview of Senate FY24–25 State Budget
  33. Constructing an Adequate School Funding Formula
  34. Summary of LSC HB 1 Fiscal Note
  35. House Bill 1 Summary & Analysis
  36. OEPI Economically Disadvantaged Student Cost Study
  37. Ohio Gifted Education Incentives Study
  38. Ohio Educational Service Center Cost Study
  39. Ohio English Learner Cost Study
  40. Ohio Gifted Funding Accountability Study
  41. Ohio Special Ed Cost Study
  42. New vs. Renewal Operating Levies (1994-2022)
  43. FY22 Report Card Analysis
  44. Overview of November 2022 Ohio School Levies
  45. Solar Energy Property Taxes vs. PILOT for Energy Projects (PPT)
  46. Solar Power Installation Property Taxes vs. PILOT Comparison
  47. CAUV Formula Change Analysis
  48. 2003-2022 Levies by Election
  49. New vs. Renewal and Replacement Operating Levies (1984-2022)
  50. School Operating Levies (1976-2022)
  51. School Operating & Capital Levy Totals, By Year (1984-2022)
  52. Changes in Ohio School Funding & TPP Replacement (FY11–FY22)
  53. Overview of May 2022 Ohio School Levies on the Ballot
  54. Overview of the Ohio Senate’s FY22-23 School Funding Formula
  55. The Central Importance of the DeRolph Rulings to School Funding in Ohio
  56. HB 82 Report Card System Changes
  57. Ohio Income Tax Changes and Equity (1972–2021)
  58. HB 110 EdChoice Voucher Program Changes
  59. HB 110 School Funding Formula Changes
  60. Ohio School Funding Trends (FY11–FY21)
  61. Ohio FY20 GRF Tax Revenue: COVID Impact & Recovery
  62. Ohio Solar Energy & Impact on School District Revenues
  63. House & Senate Bills Seek to Revise Ohio’s School Report Card
  64. OEPI Testimony on HB 110 School Funding
  65. Dr. Fleeter’s Testimony to the Senate Primary and Secondary Education Committee on HB 110.
  66. Updated: COVID-19 Impact on Ohio GRF Revenues (FY20 & FY21)
  67. 2020 Ohio School Levy Summary & Analysis
  68. HB 305 School Funding Plan Overview
  69. EdChoice Voucher Program Update
  70. OEPI President Message on OEPI’s Value
  71. OEPI Property Trends Report (1975-2015)
  72. Update: Appeal of Natural Gas Pipeline Values
  73. Update on Ohio’s Controversial Territory Transfer Law
  74. COVID-19 Impact on Ohio GRF Revenues (FY20 & FY21)
  75. Supplemental Funding for Power Plant Districts
  76. OEPI Officers Update
  77. Appeal of Natural Gas Pipeline Values
  78. Ohio’s Controversial Territory Transfer Law
  79. 2019 Ohio School Levy Summary & Analysis
  80. Analysis of the Cupp-Patterson School Funding Proposal (HB 305)
  81. OEPI Press Release on 20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph
  82. 20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph
  83. OEPI Analysis of Ed Trust “2018 Funding Gaps” Report
  84. OEPI Research Update: GRF Revenues, School Funding, and District Trends (2017)
  85. House Finance Primary and Secondary Ed Subcommittee House Bill 49 Testimony
  86. Analysis of HB 398 & SB 246 Changes to Ohio’s CAUV Formula
  87. OEPI Research Update: GRF Revenues, Funding Formula Issues & School Levies (2016)
  88. Community School Funding & Ohio Education Finance Trends
  89. CS Deduction and the Gain Cap
  90. Open Enrollment
  91. FY16-17 GRF Tax Revenues
  92. Casino & VLT Revenues
  93. OEPI Value Added Newsletter Article
  94. Senate Bill 208 Modifications to TPP Replacement Payments
  95. 2015 School Levy Update
  96. FY 16-17 Guarantee & Gain Cap
  97. Preliminary FY 15 Ohio Test Score Analysis
  98. Video Lottery Terminal (VLT) Revenue Update
  99. FY16-17 Phase-Out of TPP Replacement Payments
  100. FY16-17 School Funding Components
  101. Casino Tax Revenue Update
  102. Budget Bill Changes Election Law
  103. Transitional Aid Guarantee Analysis
  104. School Funding Comparison & Analysis: FY15 vs. FY17 Plans
  105. Recent Changes in Ohio Property Valuations
  106. State/Local Share of Funding in FY14-15 as Proposed by the Governor and House for FY16-17

Back in the spring of this year even the most casual observer of state and local government finance was no doubt aware of the significant negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic and the related contraction of Ohio’s economy had on the state’s General Revenue Fund (GRF) tax revenues. At the end of February (2/3rd of the way through FY20), state GRF tax receipts were $249 million above estimate. However, February was the last full month before the pandemic-related stay-at-home and business shut-down orders were issued by Governor Mike DeWine. Over the four month “Covid-contraction” period from March-June 2020, state GRF tax revenues were $1.348 billion below estimates. Adjusting for the fact that roughly $80 million of the revenue shortfall relative to estimated levels was the result of early payment of foreign insurance taxes in February, the March-June pandemic time frame resulted in a reduction of state tax revenue of $1.270 billion compared to what had been estimated. Furthermore, this reduction was entirely attributable to a combined $1.3 billion reduction in state sales and income tax receipts over the four-month March-June time period. The net effect of this shortfall was that final GRF tax revenues for FY20 were $1.099 billion below estimate.

 

Table 1 below provides an overview of state income tax and sales tax revenues in FY20, with an emphasis on the March-June time frame. (Note that non-auto and auto sales are combined in Table 1 due to space constraints, even though OBM typically reports them separately.)

 

Table 1: FY20 March-June GRF Sales Tax & Income Tax Revenues: ($ in Millions)

Month Sales Tax Estimate Sales Tax Actual Difference Income Tax Estimate Income Tax Actual Difference
July-Feb. Subtotal $7,272.0 $7,417.4 $145.4 $5,608.0 $5,590.4 -$17.6
March $819.5 $751.5 -$68.0 $438.8 $416.5 -$22.3
April $984.6 $747.9 -$236.7 $1,258.0 $622.2 -$635.7
May $949.8 $782.5 -$167.3 $605.1 $513.7 -$91.4
June $987.9 $986.5 -$1.4 $816.5 $738.5 -$78.0
March -June Total $3,741.8 $3,268.4 -$473.4 $3,118.4 $2,290.9 -$827.5
4 Month % Reduction -12.7% -26.5%

The top row of Table 1 shows that through the first eight months of FY20 auto and non-auto sales tax revenues were a combined $145.4 million (2.0%) ahead of estimate, while personal income tax revenue was $17.6 million (-0.3%) below estimate. However, the remainder of Table 1 shows that from March-June, sales tax revenues were $473.4 million (12.7%) below estimate and income tax revenues were $827.5 million (26.5%) below estimate. Adding these two figures results in a total loss of expected sales and income tax revenue over the final 4 months of FY20 of $1.301 billion. While not shown in Table 1, non-auto sales tax revenue was $381.8 million below estimate from March- June while auto sales tax revenue was $91.6 million below estimate, which add up to the sales tax total of $473.4 million below estimate.

 

Table 2 reports actual vs. estimated FY20 GRF tax revenues for each state tax and shows that total FY20 state tax revenues fell short of estimated revenues by $1.009 billion. This tax revenue loss, combined with the decision not to tap into the state’s $2.7 billion Rainy Day fund in FY20, was what necessitated the $775 million in budget cuts implemented by Governor DeWine in May.

 

Table 2: FY20 Final General Revenue Fund Tax Revenues: ($ in Millions)

GRF Tax Actual Revenue Estimated Revenue Difference
Non-Auto Sales Tax $9,183 $9,466 ($283)
Auto Sales Tax $1,503 $1,548 ($45)
Income Tax $7,881 $8,726 ($845)
Commercial Activity Tax $1,672 $1,639 $33
Cigarette Tax $913 $892 $21
Kilowatt Hour Tax $332 $335 ($3)
Foreign Insurance Tax $305 $292 $13
Domestic Insurance Tax $303 $301 $2
Financial Institutions Tax $215 $190 $25
Public Utility Excise Tax $141 $140 $1
Natural Gas MCF Tax $60 $78 ($18)
Alcoholic Beverage Tax $54 $56 ($2)
Liquor Gallonage Tax $53 $50 $3
Petroleum Activity Tax $9 $10 ($1)
Total GRF Taxes $22,623 $23,722 ($1,099)

Table 2 shows that the net result of the $473.4 million in lost sales tax revenue over the last four months of the fiscal year meant that total sales tax revenues went from $145.4 million above estimate through February to $328.0 million ($283 +$45) below estimate through June.

 

A Complication: The Delay of the Income Tax Filing Date
To completely understand the figures shown in Table 2 it is necessary to understand the impact of the decision to delay the filing date for state income taxes. In order to avoid requiring Ohio taxpayers to make final income tax payments for 2019 and estimated tax payments for 2020 while in the midst of the pandemic, the state of Ohio agreed to match the Federal government’s decision to delay the income tax filing date from April 15th to July 15th. This delay meant that income tax returns for 2019 and estimated tax payments for 2020 did not need to be filed in FY20, as July is the first month of the FY21 fiscal year. Analysis of income tax data showing April 2020 estimated and annual return tax payments in comparison with 2019 figures suggests that roughly $530 million of the $827.5 million reduction in income tax revenues from March-June was due to the delay of the filing date from April to July. This meant that an estimated $297.5 million (9.5%) in expected income tax revenue was lost from March through June as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. ($827.5 million reduction in revenues – $530 million lost due to filing date change = $297.5 million lost due to Covid impact).

 

FY21 GRF Estimated Tax Revenues
As a result of the $1.1 billion Covid-driven reduction in FY20 GRF tax revenues discussed above, the Office of Budget and Management (OBM) revised its FY21 GRF tax revenue estimates downward in May. The revised FY21 tax revenue estimates are roughly $2.3 billion lower than the original FY21 estimates from July 2019. FY21 revenue estimates were revised downward, as follows:
1) Non-auto sales tax revenues were lowered by $1.249 billion (-13.0%)
2) Auto sales tax revenues were lowered by $220 million (-13.8%)
3) Personal income tax revenues were lowered by $660 million (-7.2%)
4) Commercial Activity tax revenues were lowered by $163 million (-9.9%)

 

Table 3 provides a comparison of the original July 2019 FY21 tax revenue estimates with the revised May 2020 FY21 tax revenue estimates.

 

Table 3: FY21 Revised GRF Tax Revenue Estimates: ($ in Millions)

GRF Tax July 2019 Revenue Estimate May 2020 Revenue Estimate Reduction Amount % Reduction
Non-Auto Sales Tax $9,589 $8,340 -$1,249 -13.0%
Auto Sales Tax $1,592 $1,372 -$220 -13.8%
Sales Tax Total $11,181 $9,712 -$1,469 -13.1%
Income Tax $9,187 $8,527 -$660 -7.2%
Commercial Activity Tax $1,653 $1,490 -$163 -9.9%
All Other Taxes $2,329 $2,329 $0
Total GRF Tax Revenue $24,350 $22,058 -$2,292 -9.4%

Note that the revised FY21 sales tax revenue estimate of $9.712 billion would be the lowest collection total for Ohio’s sales tax since FY14.

 

Note also that the personal income tax revenue estimate includes the roughly $530 million in additional revenue (less refunds owed) that OBM expected to see in July that would normally have been collected in April but was not due until July 15th due to the filing deadline delay. This means that the “baseline” personal income tax reduction is really -$1,190 million (-13.0%). Explained another way, if not for the $530 million in additional revenue that is expected to be received in FY21only because of the income tax filing date change, the $660 million reduction from Table 3 would really be $1.190 million ($660 + $530 = $1.190). Also, if the income tax revenue collected in July that would normally have been owed in April is included in the FY20 total (where it would have accrued without the delay in the filing deadline), the FY21 income tax revenue estimate would be the lowest collection total since FY17.

 

As a final note, the $2.3 billion estimated shortfall in tax revenues prompted OBM to continue the $775 million in FY20 budget cuts made in June into FY21. $300 million of the $775 million reductions were made to foundation formula payments for traditional K-12 school districts.

 

FY21 GRF Tax Revenues (July-November)
Table 4 below provides a summary of FY21 actual revenues compared to the original July 2019 estimates through the first 5 months of the fiscal year (July-November). Note that the income tax revenue estimate has been adjusted to reflect the delay in the income tax filing date from April 15th to July 15th; however, the estimated revenue figures shown in Table 4 do NOT reflect the downward revenue revisions made by OBM in June (shown in Table 3 above).

 

Table 4: FY21 Actual vs. Originally Estimated* GRF Tax Revenues July-November: ($ in Millions)

GRF Tax July-Nov. 2020 Actual Revenues July 2019 Estimated Revenues Difference % Difference
Non-Auto Sales Tax $4,176 $3,967 $209 5.3%
Auto Sales Tax $755 $657 $98 14.9%
Sales Tax Total $4,930 $4,624 $306 6.6%
Income Tax* $4,240 $4,170 $70 1.7%
Cigarette Tax $348 $322 $26 8.1%
Commercial Activity Tax $759 $780 ($21) -2.7%
Kilowatt Hour Tax $133 $146 ($13) -8.9%
All Other Taxes $295 $270 $25 9.3%
Total GRF Tax Revenue $10,706 $10,312 $394 3.8%

Table 4 shows that FY21 Non-Auto Sales tax revenues are $209 million (5.3%) more than through November (the first 5 months of FY21). Similarly, FY21 Auto Sales tax revenues are $98 million (14.9%) more than estimated through November. Total Sales Tax revenues are $306 million (6.6%) more than estimates through the first 5 months of FY21.

Table 4 also shows that FY21 Personal Income tax revenues are $70 million (1.7%) above the original July 2019 estimated revenues through November (after adjusting for the delay in the income tax payment due date from April 15th to July 15th) and that Cigarette tax revenues are $26 million (8.1% above the original July 2019 estimated level. Only the Commercial Activity Tax ($21 million below estimate) and the Kilowatt Hour Tax ($13 million below estimate) are appreciably below the originally estimated revenue levels through the first 5 months of FY21.

 

The bottom line in Table 4 is that Total GRF Tax Revenues are $394 million above estimates through November (the first 5 months of FY21). Again, this revenue difference is in comparison to the original July 2019 revenue estimates, not to the June 2020 lowered revenue estimates. Additionally, GRF Tax Revenues through November of 2020 are also running over $930 million ahead of collections when compared to November of 2019 GRF Revenues. However, it is important to note that roughly 60% of the $930 million figure is due to the delay of the income tax payment deadline from April 15th to July 15th.

 

Furthermore, pro-rating the June 2020 $2.3 billion downward revision in FY21 tax revenues 5/12th of the way through the year results in a $958 million reduction in estimated tax revenue below the original estimate. This means that actual FY21 revenues through November are about $1.35 billion more than the revised FY21 revenue estimates. Clearly the anticipated massive $2.3 billion reduction in tax revenue that was forecast by OBM in June has not yet materialized nearly halfway through the FY21 fiscal year. However, neither OBM or the Governor’s office has as yet given any indications that the $300 million in reductions in FY21 foundation payments will be reversed (roughly $137.5 million in reductions have occurred thus far (through the December #1 SFPR payment).